The Brief

A convicted ISIS supporter who was released approximately two and a half years early from an 11-year federal sentence opened fire in an ROTC classroom at Old Dominion University on March 12, killing Army Lt. Col. Brandon Shah and one other victim before ROTC students subdued and killed him. The FBI is investigating the shooting as an act of terrorism. The gunman, Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, 36, had been on supervised release since December 2024 and had re-enrolled at ODU as a student.

The Report

Mohamed Bailor Jalloh entered a College of Business classroom at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, at approximately 10:45 a.m. on Wednesday, asked whether it was an ROTC class, and upon confirmation opened fire while shouting “Allahu Akbar.” He killed Army Lt. Col. Brandon Shah, 42, the ROTC instructor and professor of military science who had led the programme since 2022. A second victim later died at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital. Two others were injured — one initially in critical condition, since upgraded to fair, and one treated and released.

ROTC students in the classroom attacked Jalloh during the shooting. One student killed the gunman with a knife. FBI Special Agent in Charge Dominique Evans said the students “rendered him no longer alive,” adding that they showed “extreme bravery and courage” and prevented further casualties. The suspect carried one weapon — a gun with a partially obliterated serial number — and no explosives were found. Law enforcement confirmed the shooter was dead less than ten minutes after the first 911 call.

The Justice Department has since charged Kenya Chapman with selling Jalloh the weapon — a gun stolen from a car in Newport News approximately a year earlier. Chapman, previously investigated in 2021 for straw purchases, told authorities he sold the firearm to Jalloh knowing he had “spent some time behind bars” but claimed ignorance of his terrorism conviction. Phone records between the two in the week before the attack led investigators to Chapman.

Jalloh, a naturalised U.S. citizen born in Sierra Leone, served in the Virginia National Guard from 2009 to 2015 as a combat engineer before becoming radicalised through online lectures by deceased al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. He pleaded guilty in 2016 to attempting to provide material support to ISIS after an FBI sting operation in which he attempted to donate money to the group, tried to purchase firearms, and told an informant he wanted to carry out an attack modelled on the 2009 Fort Hood shooting. Prosecutors requested a 20-year sentence. Judge Liam O’Grady imposed 11 years plus five years of supervised release.

Jalloh was released from federal custody on December 23, 2024 — roughly two and a half years early — after completing a drug treatment programme that typically renders terrorism convicts ineligible for sentence reduction. No official explanation has been given for how he qualified. He re-enrolled at ODU in summer 2025 as a geography major and was a current student at the time of the attack.

Shah was a decorated Army aviator with over 1,200 flight hours, more than 600 in combat, across deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Europe. He held two Bronze Stars, an Air Medal with Valor, and a Combat Action Badge. He had been commended for increasing ROTC enrolment at ODU by nearly 50 per cent. He is survived by a spouse and child.

The FBI said it found no evidence connecting the attack to the ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict. FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed the Joint Terrorism Task Force is fully engaged in the investigation.


The Angle

The system that processed Mohamed Bailor Jalloh did everything it was designed to do. It arrested him. It convicted him. It sentenced him to just over half the term prosecutors requested. It enrolled him in a drug treatment programme that inmates with terrorism convictions are typically ineligible for, shaved years off his sentence, moved him to a halfway house, and released him onto supervised probation with a computer monitoring order. At his sentencing, Jalloh delivered precisely the kind of statement the system is built to receive — remorse, denunciation, a narrative of personal growth. The system heard it, recorded it, and processed him accordingly.

Nine years later, Jalloh walked into a classroom, confirmed it was full of ROTC students, and opened fire on a man who had spent two decades in uniform.

The political responses have already sorted themselves into their predictable containers. Norfolk’s Commonwealth’s Attorney used the press conference to blame gun legislation. Congressional Republicans pointed to the early release. The gun control framing and the sentencing framing will now compete for oxygen as though they are the whole of the problem, and as though a man who tried to buy an AK-47 in 2016, purchased an AR-15 when that failed, and a decade later obtained a stolen handgun with an obliterated serial number from a known straw purchaser was ever going to be meaningfully inconvenienced by either policy lever.

The more specific failure is quieter and harder to assign to a party. The federal system possesses no functioning mechanism for distinguishing between a convicted terrorist who has genuinely deradicalised and one who has learned to say what the system needs to hear. The sentencing memo described Jalloh’s extremism as a “shallow search for identity and purpose.” His own statement was fluent in the grammar of rehabilitation. The drug programme that shortened his sentence was designed to measure compliance, not conviction. Every checkpoint along the pipeline from arrest to release tested whether Jalloh could perform the role of a reformed offender. He could. The question of whether he had actually become one was structurally unanswerable by the tools in use, and no one in the process was required to try.

What ended the attack was not a system. It was a roomful of students — trained by the man who was being killed in front of them — who closed the distance and stopped the shooter with a knife. The institution built to prevent this outcome processed Jalloh through every available gate and released him. The people in the room, with no institutional authority and no weapons, did what the institution could not.